Activity for chaosgreml.in
Loading activity...
We have a tool for this, it’s called licensing. Put a license on your content. It tells people what they can and can’t do with it.
nothing against Anuj, just want to ask something this made me think about. we care about users but up until their data is on protocol? now the intended use and expected usage is irrelevant. this is literally a consent shaped thing, stansite records have a canonical home they should be viewed there
I want to be clear that this sounds like “why publish a webpage if you don’t expect people to scrape it,” which is effectively the argument made about Common Crawl and LLMs. Dunno if that’s Anuj’s intent, but it basically says “fuck copyright”
I don't understand the statement here? Why have data out in the open if you're not expecting it to be used the way open data is used? For those that don't want that, there will be permissioned spaces or non-protocol platforms. You're trying to force people to use squares in a circle here.
Today’s been a rough day. Felt like shit most of the day because my poor doggo Paris got ganged up on by the other dogs and we had to bandage her up :( And then I just sucked at remembering the things my partner has asked me to remember and I’m behind on so many things. ADHD blows. Trauma blows.
always fun to see @oyster.cafe commenting on HN! news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4895...
People want so earnestly to ignore the physical consequences of their digital actions, upon others & themselves, when that division has zero relevance to the human psyche. A person does not categorically experience less pain or harm bc you enact digital violence upon them as opposed to physical.