Activity for edmacovaz.com
Loading activity...
There is a middle ground between not criticising because “builders gotta build” and telling people they’re a bad person because the thing they made isn’t good. Criticisms of poor choices and the chance to move on after making a bad choice are both necessary.
Another day where I see AI is convincing us to write documentation for agents that we should have written for humans a long time ago.
Not a lot of people have spoken about this. Sure, great for prototyping, often creates slop, but for enabling polish and detail, especially for designers, there’s huge potential.
Respect to the growth team at Vercel. Sad thing is that they probably had this ready.
Underrated advantage of coding with LLMs: opening a chat with a record of what you were doing right before you went to those three meetings in a row is super helpful
Fantastic idea. Sure this will go great. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
A particularly infuriating part of working with LLMs is that when the conversations get longer because you’re having issues, it seems to gets more and more confused from having to work with more overlapping context. So as things get worse it gets less competent. Anyone seen research on this?
How far are we from Claude taking screen videos or sequences to verify interactions and animations?Screenshots feel very limited.
Question modals are the worst part of the Claude experience. I love how they built something that can almost have a conversation but turned it into an IVR/Google form because… I dunno why they do this