Activity for pdj.bsky.social
Loading activity...
Oh I know. That's why you shouldn't trust any of them without significant safeguard in your prompting.
It proves we're human I've been thinking about this and I do find that the "why" of metrics is something that sets a really good leader apart from the rest. It's not the technical capability or even the experience. We've really failed to teach people to think about the why in tech.
Just knowing what the metrics are isn't enough. Why the metrics exist and what it is each metric is signalling at more important.
If it's the part I think you're talking about, it definitely tells you before doing it.
It was bad data not fraudulent data. It was a bad survey and the people shouting about it were ignoring a bunch of other contradictory data. I don't think it was malice.
I've been mulling over this. Moving house is actually a big problem for identity verification in the UK. We have created (inadvertantly) a system based on things like utility bills showing that we have a name at a given address. That's an issue that is nothing to do with One Login.
To be clear, One Login is, in essence, quite simple. It mediates interactions and consent management between Govt departments. If your driving licence took a while to come through, it was the fault of the implementation at the DVLA, not One Login.
That almost certainly wasn't One Login, but one of the services that uses it. I hear a lot of criticisms of it, and I understand them I do. But it's actually an excellent service that does a lot of things to provide a way for you to be in control of consent to data being shared with Govt services.
And ... again ... I'm not defending the Church or Christians. I'm probably aware of far more than most on here will ever be around Church failures, and supported many people through significant issues of abuse at scale in churches too. I'm not defending Christianity.
The choice of "words and imagery" not being obviously hate-filled is not the point and never was. It's the choice of campaigns they take on. It's the constant sniping at Christianity. It's the fact that the org seems to only get noticed for anti Christian stuff. No need to project motive.
Suggest you stop posting. I'm not trying to rage bait you. I just dislike how you approach pretty much every story about Christianity and how the only time I hear about you is when it's an anti Christian story. I'm not denying there are issues, but it really feels like there's a vendetta.
Do you know how many food banks are basically run and maintained by Christians? You never talk about that.
"All we wanted was the truth" Honestly, I get it, and I appreciate it. Good data is important. But you could focus the answer on that instead of sounding like a hate filled anti Christian org.
This whole "Humanists point out that there wasn't and isn't a quiet revival in the Church" story is just mean. I get that you don't want the church to grow. But you don't have to point it out. You just don't.
The Humanists only ever seem to pop up when there's a Christian story. And, yes, Christians and Churches aren't very good on the whole at the kind of things Humanists think are the right ways to do things. But Christians often turn up for people in need (not always for the best reasons).
The anti church school thing the Humanists bang on about is frankly a bit weird. I get that you might not want your kid to be told about Christianity. But every church school I know or have heard of is almost always very respectful of different beliefs. You don't have to send your kids to.